Sustainable intensification in Tanzania: towards a better understanding of spatial variability of input responses to reduce farmer’s risks

By elias.nagol , 4 April, 2016
    Organizational Context
    Name
    Elias Moringe NAGOL
    Chairgroup
    PPS
    Graduate school
    PE&RC
    Start date of project
    Abstract

    Smallholder farmers constitute an important part of Tanzania’s agricultural economy contributing about 85% of maize produce (Suleiman and Kurt, 2015). The country’s national annual growth rate of maize is steadily rising at 4.6% in the last two and half decades and is the largest maize producer in East Africa (Barreiro-Hurle and J., 2012). However, maize yields are among the lowest in the Sub-Saharan Africa, fluctuating between 1.0 and 1.5 tonnes per hectare (Mbwaga and Massawe, 2002, FAOSTAT, 2015). Soil degradation constitutes one of the most limiting factors (Tenge et al., 2004, Mbaga-Semgalawe and Folmer, 2000) due to poor management practices. Agricultural land use without appropriate nutrient management results in ongoing reduction of soil fertility, leading to a poverty cycle (Tittonell and Giller, 2013). Tanzanian soils are often nutrient depleted and nutrients are more often yield limiting than water (Mowo et al., 2006). Targeted and efficient fertilizer use by improved nutrient management is key to increasing food production (Vanlauwe et al., 2011). There is still a poor understanding of the enormous variability in yield responses of various crops to fertilizer application. A wide range of factors may influence this response to fertilizer including management (sowing times, weed control), weather, soil constraints and effects of pests and diseases. A combination of proper fertilizer application with better management techniques is assumed to result in desired yield increment. This study will use UAVs to better understand spatial variability of input responses leading to improved fertilizer application advice combined with enhanced smallholder farming management practices for optimized maize yields in Tanzania. 

    Role supervisor

    Dr. Ken Giller is the promotor and overall supervisor of the PhD, while Dr. Tom Schut is the daily supervisor. Meetings with the three of us will be on a monthly basis. The expertise of Dr. Ken Giller is in the area of soil-plant nutrition and systems analysis, and of Dr. Tom Schut is in soil science, (spatial) system analysis and simulation modelling of scenario change. Dr. Kenneth Masuki (TAMASA project country coordinator) has expertise in Soil Science and Soil and Water Engineering and Agricultural Education and Extension. He will will assist in planning and implementation of field trials and engaging with farmers and local government at all stages of the study. If for any reason the composition of the supervisory team will change, appropriate substitution will be sought within WUR or other parties involved. 

    Who's collecting the data

    Datasets are being made available by TAMASA (Kenneth Masuki). Additional data will be collected by me.

    Who's analysing the data

    Data analysis will be conducted by me in collaboration with TAMASA members. 

    Location short term storage

    All data will be stored on my local harddisk in a folder called Thesis.

    Within this Thesis folder, I'll create per chapter the folders: DataModel, Paper and Scripts. The Data folder has two sub-folders called: Raw and Processed.

    Folder contents:

    • Data - Raw sub-folder: Contains all raw data and meta-data (a description of your data).
    • Data - Processed sub-folder: Contains all processed data. 
    • Model folder: Complete listing of the model and the model results & analysis.
    • Paper folder: Text of a chapter / paper.  
    • Scripts folder: Contains all scripts used.
    Backup procedure

    The complete content of my local Thesis folder will be stored on the backup server of PPS. 

    During periods I'm abroad, I'll backup the complete content of my local Thesis folder to a Dropbox Thesis folder and share the contents with my supervisor(s). 

    Research data with value for long term storage

    All datasets used for my project, analysis reports, publications, posters.

    Research data excluded for long term storage. Why?

    Some data will remain the property of different organisations who have obtained the data and are thus owners. These data may be excluded from long term storage. Clear agreements regarding (long term) storage will be made with the owners of the data under confidentiality agreements.

    Plans for sharing data?

    As far as possible all data will be publically available. However, some data will remain in ownership of the parties who have collected the data. Where relevant, agreements about sharing the data will be made through confidentiality agreements. 

    How to access data once you leave?

    All data will be stored on the PhD Library Site of PPS. 

    Specific funders requirements for sharing data, or to impose embargo?

    No.

    Other parties involved? Agreements on data sharing?

    Yes. Confidentiality agreements will be made with all relevant parties.

    Other persons contributing (e.g. writing code)

    QUEFTS and FARMSIM models have been developed at and are available through WUR. 

    Other persons with specific responsibility for data?

    The owners of the data set will be contacted with regards to any questions about their datasets.

    Privacy, security issues? How you deal with them?

    All privacy sensitive information will be removed from the data prior to storage/sharing/publication.